I am in California and am thinking of getting licensed. I am planning on working for a company and not go out on my own. But I was wondering if being able to say you are broker instead of just a regular agent is of benefit.

I need to take 1 class and pass exam to be an agent. I need 3 classes (2 classes plus 1 that is same for agent license) and pass exam to become a broker. I have a BBA in Finance with an emphasis in real estate so many of my college classes was accepted torwards becoming a broker. In addition my degree can be taken place of the 2 year experience.

Does it make a difference? What would be the best course of action for me?
Thank you

The public won't automatically give you any more respect if you are a broker rather than a salesperson. People want someone competent to work with and you'll need to convey that with your expertise and knowledge and not with your title.

Still, I'd aim for the broker license (even if you want to work under another broker). Later, get a GRI, CRS and ABR designation. You'll be more knowledgable, better able to serve clients, be in a better position to get referrals, and be more likely to succeed in your business.

In Cal. Don't put much on the designation's. It doesn't work well as client could care less, look at the guy from brekley, ATD designation means "All the Designations".

Get your brokers license, it shows that you have an additional level of education. Look at it like having a MBA instead of a BA.
It is not a designation like a GRI or CRS, it is a different level of education that authorizes you to run your own company or supervise other agents if you ever want to.

Great thank you for the advice!

It does make more sense for me to get a brokers license. Because of my college course I only need 3 more classes.

I'll go for it.

Thanks