|
|
#60355 - 06/28/06 01:17 PM
Re: Address Verifcation Photo Tip
|
Major Contributor
Registered: 04/21/05
Posts: 1879
Loc: kentucky
|
I sort of do the same thing. I crop the house number out and enlarge it from the original front photo. Some people who know they are going into foreclosure remove the house numbers, first thing. I find this a lot. They think they are so clever. I then use either the MLS photo, or the PVA photo for verification.
_________________________
Comments made are my opinion, and not intended to be legal advice of any kind.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60356 - 06/28/06 01:19 PM
Re: Address Verifcation Photo Tip
|
Major Contributor
Registered: 01/18/05
Posts: 1525
Loc: Ohio
|
How many mega pixels? I've tried with mine, and maybe I'm just using a bad prog, or don't know what the heck I'm doing, cuz but they always turn out horrid
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60357 - 06/28/06 01:41 PM
Re: Address Verifcation Photo Tip
|
Veteran Member
Registered: 08/10/05
Posts: 844
Loc: MN
|
I use a 5mp with 12x zoom. I usually never have to zoom, and I can crop out the number with good clarity. The only problem is when they have brass/gold colored numbers and the house is brown or tan and the lighting is bad, then I have to zoom, some of those are hard to see with your eyes.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60363 - 06/29/06 05:47 AM
Re: Address Verifcation Photo Tip
|
Major Contributor
Registered: 01/18/05
Posts: 1525
Loc: Ohio
|
The program I use is just the software thingy that came w/the cam. DigiMax, I believe. I don't really care for it myself. I'm not total moron, usually, when it comes to PCs, but the edit program is not very user friendly. The camera's either 4 or 5mp, can't remember.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60364 - 06/29/06 09:42 AM
Re: Address Verifcation Photo Tip
|
Member
Registered: 07/27/05
Posts: 74
Loc: Dearborn, MI
|
Originally posted by amplet: I use a 5mp with 12x zoom. I usually never have to zoom, and I can crop out the number with good clarity. The only problem is when they have brass/gold colored numbers and the house is brown or tan and the lighting is bad, then I have to zoom, some of those are hard to see with your eyes. If the lighting is bad, use a graphics editing program and adjust the brightness/contrast until you get it to where you can see it.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60365 - 06/29/06 10:35 AM
Re: Address Verifcation Photo Tip
|
Veteran Member
Registered: 08/17/05
Posts: 701
Loc: Birmingham, Alabama
|
As usual, ROTFLMAO @ Gary! Dude, you missed your calling, you should have been a comedian. But, seriously, you are right about the Circuit City open box specials. Two nights ago I bought a Samsung MP3 player that was given a 4 star rating by Consumer Reports for only $80! The player sold normally for $150! So, yes, I'm sure that you can find a great camera deal at Circuit City. BTW, can someone walk me through cropping the address on houses for the address verification shot. I would really like to know how to do that. My 5 megapixel only has a 4X optical zoom. Do I need more power from my optical zoom?
_________________________
George W. Jackson, IV Associate Broker, SFR Keller Williams Realty "Providing A Higher Level of Professional Service"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60366 - 06/29/06 12:19 PM
Re: Address Verifcation Photo Tip
|
Veteran Member
Registered: 06/15/04
Posts: 1187
Loc: Watsonville, CA, USA
|
No 4x will be enough, and when you're cropping out it don't matter anyway. I'll assume you're using photoshop....
Always always always start with a maximum resolution pic. Always.
In photoshop, with your crop tool selected you can choose not just size but also resolution. One company requires 400x600, so this is what I use for everyone. Nobody has ever complained. Up at the top of your tool bar put in 4" high 6" wide and 100 dpi. Now click the down arrow next to the picture of the tool...hit the right circle arrow...choose first thing on the menu, New Preset. Name that preset "BPO". From now on you can just click the picture of the tool on the left and choose BPO.
With this preset selected from now on your crop tool will be forced to 4x6 proportions. You can crop as big or small as you like, it will adjust it to 400 x 600. The bigger you make your crop area the higher res the final picture because it adjusts it to 400 x 600. Some examples. If you actually selected 400 x 600 pictures from the original, your final picture will be the same resolution as that area in the original (if you select bigger than 400 x 600 the resolution stays the same more or less) Now if you selected an itty bitty area, say 4 pixels x 6 pixels Photoshop would copy each of those pixels 100 times each and you would have an incredibly blury ugly mess of a picture. Take your original high res pic, draw a crop around just the numbers, enter... SaveAs "numbers" Hit undo, back to original, now draw a crop around the whole house (but not the window frame of your car), enter, SaveAs "front" Now hit the "X" close the picture Do NOT save on closing and whala, you've got a number pic, a front view without your window frame and a high res original for your file in case you have to prove whatever.
So... you've got a picture of a house with numbers on the front... Here's some real numbers 5.0 Mega pixel = 1920 x 2560 3.0 megapixel= 1536 x 2048 My cell phone = 480 x 640. So if you crop out the house numbers, that's probably about 10% of the pic. in the 5 meg picture thats 192 x 256 real pixels... when photoshop makes it 400 x 600 its gonna have to about double it. Nobody will notice, nice pic. If you use the cell phone it's gonna have to multiply it by 10... blurry as hell. The 3Meg is somewhere in the middle.
The Optical zoom doesn't come into play here... your dealing with the picture you have. The optical zoom is for when you're 800 yards away on the otherside of the gate from the pitbull... with 3x zoom your pictures about half sky and stuff...you crop that out and you're starting with half a picture. With 12x Optical zoom, you zoom in (the lense buzzes and moves) and your whole picture is house, just like you pulled right up to it. My current camera is 6x, quite adequate, but I want more more more...
Man that was a long post, my fingers hurt.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60367 - 06/29/06 12:40 PM
Re: Address Verifcation Photo Tip
|
Veteran Member
Registered: 06/15/05
Posts: 1245
Loc: Texas
|
Wow, you guys are getting too technical for me. I have probably taken more than 10,000 BPO photos and never cropped a photo yet.
_________________________
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60368 - 06/29/06 12:46 PM
Re: Address Verifcation Photo Tip
|
Veteran Member
Registered: 08/17/05
Posts: 701
Loc: Birmingham, Alabama
|
Well, I think I can follow all of the directions easily enough, but, now, I see my problem...I'm not using photoshop! I'm using some default program that came with my Dell computer. How much does it cost to buy photoshop?
_________________________
George W. Jackson, IV Associate Broker, SFR Keller Williams Realty "Providing A Higher Level of Professional Service"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60372 - 06/29/06 01:43 PM
Re: Address Verifcation Photo Tip
|
Member
Registered: 07/27/05
Posts: 74
Loc: Dearborn, MI
|
Photoshop is unnecessary actually. Microsoft photo editor works just as well for cropping and doing simple touch-up work and is a helluva lot cheaper too. I think it comes with MS office.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#60373 - 06/29/06 02:10 PM
Re: Address Verifcation Photo Tip
|
Veteran Member
Registered: 06/15/04
Posts: 1187
Loc: Watsonville, CA, USA
|
No doubt photoshop is an overkill for BPO photo's... it really shines when it comes to making flyers, brochures,websites, postcards, business cards, newspaper ads, newsletters, labels and the like for the rest of your business.
If you have photoshop for other uses, its great for BPO's but I doubt I'd buy it just for the BPO work.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
This Google Custom search may do a better job of searching the forums for some keywords than the old forum search does. The results do not include threads from the Asset Managers Forum however. To search that forum you will need to be actually in the Asset Managers Forum and you will need to use the old forum search below.
|
|
Registered: 02/25/05
Posts: 2232
|
|
|