I agree with deepsea . . . . there are always three sides to these stories:
The SalesPerson's;
The Broker's;
and then there's that irritatingly stubborn, inalterable and persistent set of facts commonly referred to as "THE TRUTH".
So far in this thread, we've only heard the SalesPerson's viewpoint, and even then, only in the form of the original thoughts on January 31st . . . . nothing more? It may well be that if s/he didn't understand how Commissions were supposed to flow, then there may have also been a mis-interpretation of these other money related matters that have come up since the audit discovered the mis-appropriation of the Commission.
We know nothing about these other expenses that have now come to light; but it may well be that the Broker simply forgave or totally ignored (you can't get blood out of a stone) the need to be compensated for these items UNTIL the discovery of this Wayward Commission was made . . . . and THEN, the time for the Brokerage to have such a charitable attitude was over.
We need to know the terms of whatever Independent Contractor Agreement may have now been enforced and then hear "The Rest of the Story !"
_________________________
Dale C. Hittle of GOLDEN RULE PROPERTIES in Glover, Vermont
Where We're Always Striving To Put Together "THE FAIR DEAL"