|
|
#232193 - 06/13/08 06:35 AM
Re: Speaking of Back Links...
[Re: repa]
|
Junior Member
Registered: 06/13/08
Posts: 4
Loc: SE USA
|
article marketing will actually help establish both your site as an authority and give your site quality back links. just something to think about.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#232547 - 06/14/08 09:14 PM
Re: Speaking of Back Links...
[Re: Perky_REALTOR]
|
Member
Registered: 05/16/08
Posts: 14
Loc: Philippines
|
I did a google link check on my website - it shows about 138 links to my site, and almost all of them come from ActiveRain.
NONE, and I mean NONE, come from this site, where I've had my site linked in my signature for months and months....and as you can see by my post count, I have a lot of posts.
So why isn't this site showing up in my backward links?
Neither are any of my posts from another forum (not real estate).
Does google not count forums anymore? Most links listed by google are links associated with contents... though signatures may help but they are for real traffic and not for building PR... but still, signatures are one of the most powerful way of advertising..
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#264568 - 12/13/08 11:45 PM
Re: Speaking of Back Links...
[Re: repa]
|
Member
Registered: 12/04/08
Posts: 22
Loc: Vancouver, Canada
|
I have heard that PR isn't all that important. I noticed a big improvement in SERP when I started backlinking and posting on local forums that are very active (TONS of bears who like to be punished in flame wars).
I put the street addresses (not the suite addresses) of my listings in Google and the listings on my site come up #1 (I'm a condo realtor) all for pretty much every one. This is a recent phenomenon.
That said my PR has not improved...
Thoughts anyone?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#265914 - 12/23/08 08:06 AM
Re: Speaking of Back Links...
[Re: Mike Stewart]
|
Member
Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 11
Loc: Paphos, Cyprus
|
I have been working on many of the methods mentioned here but it seems that I can't get any higher SERP. I even lost some Pagerank in recent months.
Edited by Cleo (12/23/08 08:07 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#271097 - 01/24/09 08:42 AM
Re: Speaking of Back Links...
[Re: SaltspringRE]
|
Member
Registered: 11/09/05
Posts: 153
Loc: Toronto, Etobicoke, Mississaug...
|
While we all want PR5 backlinks, we are starting also with a PR 0
The PR 0 of today may be the PR 4 or 5 where you could have been prominantly displayed.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#347854 - 08/13/10 08:27 PM
Re: Speaking of Back Links...
[Re: Maui]
|
Junior Member
Registered: 08/13/10
Posts: 4
Loc: San Diego, CA, USA
|
To reply to the original poster. I would not rely to heavily on signature links for SEO purposes, for general internet marketing, yes! If you are looking to boost your rankings, I would do some recip. links with sites that offer great value, and do SEO themselves.
A good test, is to plug in the first 4 words of their <title> tag, and see where it ranks at on Google. If it is not on the first 3 pages or so, if probably is not a great link. Good trick, and it works!
Good luck in your SEO efforts, it is a long haul... but can pay off for you immensely. Take care!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#351035 - 09/11/10 01:41 AM
Re: Speaking of Back Links...
[Re: repa]
|
Member
Registered: 09/11/10
Posts: 39
Loc: Las Vegas Nevada
|
Duplicate meta tags are seen as duplicate content? Surely there must be a lot of sites out there that have the same text in their title and description?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#377209 - 05/27/11 06:03 PM
Re: Speaking of Back Links...
[Re: Perky_REALTOR]
|
Member
Registered: 05/19/11
Posts: 10
Loc: Southern California
|
None of the tools for viewing backlinks are 100% accurate, in my experience.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#377997 - 06/04/11 03:31 AM
Re: Speaking of Back Links...
[Re: Perky_REALTOR]
|
Junior Member
Registered: 06/04/11
Posts: 3
Loc: US
|
[quote=LVVR]Duplicate meta tags are seen as duplicate content? Surely there must be a lot of sites out there that have the same text in their title and description?[/quote]
There are, but it is not highly recommended. It may not be considered dup content, but you have to remember what those lines represent in the search engine. The title tag is going to be the first thing that they see, and the description should be your spot to give the searcher a little more incentive to click your link. Keeping them the same when all of the others on the same page as you have different information will hurt you in the long run. It only takes a minute to change, and can increase your click through rate just by having different information.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#381788 - 07/03/11 07:49 PM
Re: Speaking of Back Links...
[Re: Perky_REALTOR]
|
Member
Registered: 10/07/08
Posts: 25
Loc: California
|
Also, important to remember that lot's of links are good for ranking but the PR of the link is relevant to your PR. There may be different opinions on this issue.
For instance:
10 inbound links from 0 pr sites are less helpful to your site in terms of gaining pr than 5 high pr sites. Maybe someone can show that 10 0 pr sites can give your site pr (I am not sure) but what is important to think about is if you are seeking one way links would you rather go after 5 high pr sites for a one way link than the time it takes to go after 10 sites? Or how about 100 one way pr 0 links vs. 25 pr 4 links?
As your site becomes an authority site you will find webmasters interested in trading articles between each others website as well blogroll link exchanges. Now, this is not the same as one way links but you will find higher pr sites willing to trade with you for good content alone.
Here is an example. Maybe you wrote an excellent 500+ word article about the foreclosure process and you put a link with anchor text to a post or page on someone's site that is about foreclosures. Maybe a foreclosure expert. Your site is PR1 theirs is PR3. You and the other sites webmaster may become friends. He writes a nice article on short sales which you specialize in and he decides to link his short sale article to a very nicely written 500+ word article about short sales that you wrote and have on your site. What has happened? You gave him a deep link to his site on a particular topic and he exchanged a deep link to your site. No tricks involved. Just good simple link exchanges between two authority sites.
This topic can be expanded upon and tremendous depth.
I think you will find that the other webmaster will realize that the search engine is more interested in the exchange and interlinking of real strong content between authority websites than the fact that one site is PR4 and the other PR1. Thus, you have gained a link from a PR4 site very naturally and maybe from a PR0 page. But, that's okay.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
This Google Custom search may do a better job of searching the forums for some keywords than the old forum search does. The results do not include threads from the Asset Managers Forum however. To search that forum you will need to be actually in the Asset Managers Forum and you will need to use the old forum search below.
|
|
Registered: 06/29/07
Posts: 478
|
|
|