". . . Are they just looking for someone to fog a mirror? . . ."
I can't speak for Phoenix; but in general you have to look at it as
a game of large numbers . . . . just like in Las Vegas !
If you throw enough mud at a wall, sooner or later, some of it will stick.
Brokers as not incentivized to spend a whole lot of money on each individual Agent when the probability of success is so low. The odds are against them.
And as a Catch 22, because they spend so little on selective recruiting and training, the probability of success is low.
Here in Vermont, I now believe we have had about 58,000 people take and PASS the SalesPerson Real Estate Exam. But only about 1700 are now practicing here under active licenses . . . . and that last number includes those who went on to be Brokers. I believe we are representative of the Country as a whole.
So going on to the National scale, we have just over 1,000,000 people practicing as REALTORS®, and maybe a few hundred thousand who are Licensees; but not REALTORS®. . . . so
I wonder how many other people once had an interest in Real Estate, and maybe tried to pass the Exam, and maybe some who even passed it, and maybe then some who went on to have a License issued, and then that group who practiced for a while but became dis-enchanted with the nature of the work, the amount of work, the complexity of the work, or became disgusted with the nature of some of the personalities that we have to interact with.
That number would then appear to be in the bajillions ?I've written about this issue in the past and got roasted because some people thought I was poking fun at the folks who've tried out and dropped by the wayside.
Not at all; the industry is designed to draw just a few from a very large number. And the exact selection process defies definition.
Alls I know is that
"Many are called; but few are chosen" . . . . and you really can't blame the Brokers for not making a larger investment in the individuals when it may very well be factors well beyond their control that dictate the longevity of the individual participating Agent . . . . and you can't blame the aspiring Agents either - it's bigger than both of them.
NASA couldn't invest as much in training
Astronauts when some of the people are better suited to be
Cosmetologists. The odds would be against them.
But I digress.