Agents Online Real Estate Forums, Discussion, Realtors Marketing Tips

Follow AgentsOnline on Twitter

Click Here to display our logo on your site and link to us!
AgentsOnline Real Estate Discussion Forums Logo

Good Ideas
Nusetlock.com




REO Prep Foreclosure Listings




How To Advertise Here

More Good Ideas!
Real Estate Websites for Realtors




Build your brand on a Real Estate Site





Facebook
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#286237 - 04/15/09 03:21 PM The City of Calgary keeps producing "rubbish" in property assessments
PaulSalim Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 04/14/09
Posts: 4
Loc: Canada
INTRODUCTION
Property tax in Calgary is a fraction of assessment value and is annually collected by the Municipal Government of Calgary (usually called "The City of Calgary"). The City of Calgary annually assesses residential properties (including condominiums) using a market value standard to produce assessment values. A property’s assessment value is based on the City of Calgary’s estimate of the property’s market value on July 1 in valuation year and based on the property’s characteristics and physical conditions on December 31 in valuation year. According to law, valuation year is defined as a year prior to taxation year. For example, in 2009 taxation year, a property is assessed at $500,000 which means that the City of Calgary estimates the property’s market value at $500,000 on July 1, 2008 on the basis of the property’s characteristics and physical conditions on December 31, 2008.

The City of Calgary keeps saying that, to be a leading annual, market value assessment jurisdiction, the City of Calgary earns the respect and trust of Calgarians everyday. However, should Calgarians trust the City of Calgary on making property assessments? This manuscript answers the question.


MY PROPERTY AND THE CITY OF CALGARY
On September 1, 2004, I purchased a residential property in Banff Trail community, Calgary, Alberta, for the price of $255,000 in open market, i.e., MLS #31xxxx6 (note: MLS = a multiple listing service managed by Calgary Real Estate Board - CREB). My property had three disadvantages:

1. The property was not situated on a prime location for a residence, because it backed onto off-ramps on both sides of Crowchild Trail NW (one of the main expressways in the City of Calgary), plus eight (8) lanes for motor vehicles on Crowchild Trail NW, plus two (2) lanes of LRT tracks (note: LRT = light rail transit).

2. The property occupied a large but high-maintenance lot.

3. The property required major building renovation, because it had attic insulation made of asbestos (called “Vermiculate”), a basement floor containing asbestos, poor insulation that caused extremely high cost of utility, very old kitchen and bathroom, old furnace and boiler, malfunctioned fireplace, etc.

Since the purchase date, there has never been major renovation done to my property.

The original assessment notice released by the City of Calgary in February 2005 contained the assessment value for my property of $335,500. The value of $335,500 is supposed to be the market price of the property if the property’s owner could have sold it on July 1, 2004. Obviously in their original assessment, the City of Calgary failed to generate the actual market price of $255,000 as I paid for on September 1, 2004 (or just a few weeks after July 1, 2004). Note that the property was listed in MLS #31xxxx6 with the asking price of $289,900, but it was sold at much lower value (let alone $335,500 as originally estimated by the City of Calgary). Why was nobody willing to purchase the property at the price range of $289,900 - $335,500? The answer to the question is the actual condition of the property described in three disadvantages above.

In February 2005, the City of Calgary (without hearing) agreed to adjust the assessment value to $269,000. However, until now, the City of Calgary has been using the same assessment method that failed to produce my property’s market value of $255,000 in 2004, while my property has never significantly changed since 2004. In another word, the City of Calgary continues to produce “rubbish” shown in Table 1 for my property assessments and should not be trusted in property assessments. The “rubbish” will clearly be seen if Table 1 is compared with Table 2 that contains the average prices of residential properties in Banff Trail (a community in which my property is located). My property’s actual market value (or sale/purchase price) of $255,000 in 2004 is below the average price of $294,824 for residential sales in Banff Trail in the same year, but the City of Calgary’s assessment values of my property have always been above the average prices since 2004. The case where the City of Calgary always overestimates my property’s market values is called “rubbish”, and it is why Calgarians should not trust the City of Calgary in property assessments.

Table 1. The Continuous "Rubbish" Production by the City of Calgary for My Property

Taxation Year; Actual Market Value ($); The City of Calgary’s Assessment Value ($)
2009; n/a; 621,000
2008; n/a; 664,000
2007; n/a; 574,500
2006; n/a; 371,500
2005; 255,000 (MLS #31xxxx6); 335,500

Table 2. Residential Sales in Banff Trail (District 415)

Valuation Year (Taxation Year); Number of Sales; Average Price ($); Source
2008 (2009); 26; 534,188; CREB (2008)
2007 (2008); 64; 552,164; CREB (2007)
2006 (2007); 63; 486,894; CREB (2006)
2005 (2006); 73; 338,009; CREB (2005)
2004 (2006); 56; 294,824; CREB (2004)


LITERATURE CITED
CREB. 2004 District Statistics – Year Summary 2004.
CREB. 2005 District Statistics – Year Summary 2005.
CREB. 2006 District Statistics – Year Summary 2006.
CREB. YTD 2007 – Single Family – Community Statistics.
CREB. YTD 2008 – Single Family – Community Statistics.

Top
#297949 - 07/10/09 02:29 AM Re: The City of Calgary keeps producing "rubbish" in property assessments [Re: PaulSalim]
SaltspringRE Offline
Member

Registered: 01/07/08
Posts: 188
Loc: Gulf Islands BC
Ha ha move to BC and never pay property tax (if you are over 55). Alberta has downloaded on the Cities.

Top






Google Custom Forum Search

This Google Custom search may do a better job of searching the forums for some keywords than the old forum search does. The results do not include threads from the Asset Managers Forum however. To search that forum you will need to be actually in the Asset Managers Forum and you will need to use the old forum search below.
Search

Good Idea!
REO and Short Sale Listings
Sponsors

Newest Members
manhattanscout, hghgh, superealtor, beaucoupe, vkat007
20762 Registered Users
Who's Online
5 registered (sugarlandbpo, manhattanscout, Rcflyerbob, Home Moaner, Anton Weber), 158 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
DueDiligence 90
Vermont 89
HomeTeamGA 51
smg 41
pro 40
shana 40
pikes peak 40
75Corvette 37
Kjmendy 36
Brad - W4BJM 36
Artiste 35
Doin' bpose 34
realyte 31
Dave23 30
Rezo 29
(Views)Popular Topics
No new orders today 3953604
I MAKE 100 COLD CALLS EVERY DAY & LOVE IT! 2025828
Stupid MLS comments. 841351
EML 457988
Evalonline 299344
Land America 284999
Mainstreet 261428
What do you know about Froy Candelario, top agent in USA 248586
Pay it Forward - BPO/REO Tips & Tricks I & II 223482
New HUD Listing Brokers---Any Update? 222904
Is there religious content in Buffini class? 197342
Stupid QC comments and BPO requirements. 187268
FARVV 177240
REOTRANS 151441
USRES / RES.NET 147574
AVM Bpos 139412
asset val seminar in colorado 134413
FARVV 126751
Let's talk about our cars 120412
PAS 118318
Featured Member
Registered: 03/04/06
Posts: 217

How To Advertise Here


This site presented by RNC Internet Services