I've done several searches and can not find the info I am seeking. Specific info would be great but ball park would get me in the....well, the ball park.

In both scenarios I would touch every transaction and be responsible for much the same things, the difference will be in the amount of liability due to being the managing broker vs broker of record....and I am not the owner in either scenario.

The two caveats are.....there aren't reserves for a salary in either position and, agents will pay a flat fee for transactions they bring in vs a split for leads the house provides.

I am trying to ascertain how the “normal” compensation schedule would be structured for these positions in terms of salary / commission / bonus for a small start up office of 3-4 agents in Southern California.

I'm fighting the flu (and losing) so please feel free to let me know if there is other information I can provide that would help.
Thanks, Pete