Registered: 09/01/06
Posts: 2834
Loc: upstate New York
Jim has a point about raw land being easiest. Certainly the value of the improvements can very widely (in my rural area to have electric power available at the road adds value; if you need to run a new line a couple miles the cost is prohibitive and effects the value accordingly).
For those using the tax records I don't see anyone mentioning adjusting that ratio of tax value to market value. In my area I see a wide variation in equalization rates from as low as 5% to slightly over 100%; maybe in other parts of the country the assessors do a better job to keep up with the market.
SLO Broker
BANNED
Veteran Member
Registered: 10/16/07
Posts: 662
Loc: California
California is a different animal, you can't use assessors information as it's flawed as values are assessments are regulated to 1% per year in value gain .......
You could hav4 a piece of property that sold 5 years ago assessed at 20% of the current fair market value ......
CaliforniaSunset
Member
Registered: 12/04/07
Posts: 121
Loc: California
Yeah California is another animal. Not sure if that will fly in california. SLO, do you calculate price to build home say $90 sq. ft., then subtract that by the FMV to get Land Value?
_________________________
California Flat Fee Real Estate and Mortgage Broker. www.lavillagroup.com
This Google Custom search may do a better job of searching the forums for some keywords than the old forum search does. The results do not include threads from the Asset Managers Forum however. To search that forum you will need to be actually in the Asset Managers Forum and you will need to use the old forum search below.