|
|
#135260 - 04/16/07 05:03 PM
Re: Zillow's posting property feature:
[Re: realting]
|
Veteran Member
Registered: 05/14/05
Posts: 935
Loc: The Milky Way
|
The problem with all this "new way of thinking" is that the people who are doing the thinking don't think. Oh I bet they're thinking alright. Remember broker, Zillow didn't start this discussion to get questions answered. I believe you have more questions than answers. Zillow is a mover and shaker and you're doing the shaking. Troy, COE applies to realtors. We are discussion agency as it applies to licensed people in general. btw, you proved my point. What you are doing with your advertising and what Zillow is doing with their blogs are no different. Keep in mind that this is not about blogs. Blog was used as an example of what Zillow is doing. Zillow is merely attempting to create a discussion forum on houses for sale. If things go according to their plan everybody will be able to search by a street address and get the scoop on any house in the u.s. A Question: If I wanted to, could I pay for an ad in the newspaper advertising a house for sale that was not my listing? Or, closer to the Zillow discussion, what if I just bought an ad that said "this house at 1 Oak Street is for sale, and it's overpriced, but I have some that are priced just right."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#135284 - 04/16/07 06:20 PM
Re: Zillow's posting property feature:
[Re: Troy Richardson]
|
Member
Registered: 01/21/07
Posts: 280
|
Zillow came up with what's probably a brilliant marketing decision. Let's let agents advertise other agent's listings, and we'll call it a blog to make it fall within the ethical guidelines. Bstout, that's what I said earlier. A lot of the things in this world were considered "illegal" by late adopters but many eventually accept. Some people have an obtuse learning curve and others are much quicker. Pikes peak and broker what are you two smoking? Paceryder, great idea and that's what a smart agent should be doing. Instead of crying like babies take advantage of Zillow as a tool. With the limited amount of listings and the lack of local Realtor interest would I also be smart or unwise to advertise in the upper right hand corner for .01 a hit and commit $100 bucks a month (10,000 hits) or would that open the flood gates and I get bought out by someone willing to pay $1.00 a hit. Yes the upper right receives the highest exposure. Track the rate of conversion on every piece of marketing. I'd pay up to 999 a hit if I can earn at least 1000. A marketing decision is really an investment thus roi should be considered.
_________________________
Why do we assume that those charging less than 6% is a discount company and those charging 6% are giving full service?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#135301 - 04/16/07 07:07 PM
Re: Zillow's posting property feature:
[Re: pikes peak]
|
Major Contributor
Registered: 08/16/04
Posts: 1979
Loc: Cary, NC
|
I don't think realting is going to tell us who he/she is.
Everything will shake out and he/she will be long gone and onto the next new thing. Opportunists, after all, always do.
_________________________
the real estate industry is changing...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#135312 - 04/16/07 08:52 PM
Re: Zillow's posting property feature:
[Re: broker]
|
Member
Registered: 01/21/07
Posts: 280
|
Opportunists, after all, always do. You're an opportunist too. At a smaller scale. Everybody in real estate is an opportunist. Don't fool yourself.
Edited by realting (04/16/07 10:55 PM)
_________________________
Why do we assume that those charging less than 6% is a discount company and those charging 6% are giving full service?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#135345 - 04/16/07 11:28 PM
Re: Zillow's posting property feature:
[Re: realting]
|
Major Contributor
Registered: 06/12/06
Posts: 1856
Loc: Arizona Bay
|
Now that is typical post for you. You are great on the one liners but totally lack substance. Try making a intellectual addition to a thread instead of cute one liner or a picture. Midol, hunny?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#135358 - 04/17/07 12:27 AM
Re: Zillow's posting property feature:
[Re: SiberianWinter]
|
Major Contributor
Registered: 02/05/05
Posts: 2710
Loc: Las Vegas
|
Why? I have an fiduciary obligation to my sellers to make sure that their listing is sold in the most timely manner possible, for the best price possible.
If I don't allow other agents to "present" the property either on their web site or in their advertising, then I am actually keeping eyeballs OFF the property because I want all the buyers to come through me. Who does this serve? The seller or ME? It's better for me to keep the listing all to myself. It is NOT in the best interests of the seller.
I ran into this issue once before. Some newcomers to real estate in my office wanted to advertise my listing in a local paper (Korean) and use their names as the contacts. I didn't want to do it because I thought they were stealing my listing. "Damn it!" I thought "I worked damn hard for that listing, why should a green newbie benefit from the months of legwork it took me to get that?" But I recognized that NOT letting them do it might prevent a whole new set of eyeballs from seeing the listing. I allowed them to do it. Was I happy about it? No. But it was the right thing to do for the listing and the seller. The objective is to sell the listing....not get buyers for yourself.
To the buyer IT DOESN'T MATTER who the listing agent is ...or at least it shouldn't. How is that relevent to selling the listing?
The one stipulation should be is that no one can bad mouth the property..
SiberianWinter, You don't seem to understand what I was saying. I just believe that if another agent is going to advertise my listing, they better get my permission first. In this case of Zillow, I am sure the agents that are adding properties onto the site are not getting permission from the rightful listing agent first. You say it is not in the seller's best interest to keep the property advertising to the actual listing agent only. I don't believe this to be fully true. What if I lower the price on my listing that some other agent decided to advertise and didn't lower the price on his advertisement? Could this possibly deter buyers from being interested in my listing? YES! So updating the listing information would be one of the largest problems. About the whole commenting on property issue. Negative comments are not really fair for people to openly discuss on a specific property for sale, especially if the comment is coming from another agent. It is like they are interfering with the marketing and sale of the property. If we let just anyone make negative comments about property that they might not have even seen, then other viewers could automatically be turned off from the property just by reading the discussion. I just don't think it's right for a site to allow just anyone to comment on something that they have nothing to do with. If it were people that actually visited the property, it might be a different story with the comment section.
_________________________
Len McGuirk Prudential Americana Group Direct: (702) 203-6688 Las Vegas Real Estate
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#135389 - 04/17/07 10:10 AM
Re: Zillow's posting property feature:
[Re: pikes peak]
|
Junior Member
Registered: 04/17/07
Posts: 1
|
Hi, it's David from Zillow. Please try out this feature on Zillow -- there's quite a bit of confusion here about how it works. Reporting that a home is for sale differs from advertising a listing on Zillow. 5 minutes on Zillow.com would clear up that confusion for you -- just click the "tell us it's for sale" link on a house's detail page on Zillow and then compare the process for a listing agent to advertise their listing to the process for anyone else to report a home for sale. Here's a house that's advertised for sale by the listing agent: http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=49143474Here's a house reported for sale by a (buyer's) agent: http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?zprop=48753306Obviously it's our preference to have the listing agent advertise the home on Zillow but there is no good business, legal or ethical reason not to encourage other agents to let buyers know that your client's listing is for sale. We allow any member of the Zillow community to answer the question; "is it for sale?" and this is exactly how the real estate business often works today -- buyers' agents are often responsible for telling buyers what homes are on the market. Len - It's a mistake to confuse this feature with "allowing other agents to advertise your listings" -- that's not what's happening on Zillow. See above.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#135396 - 04/17/07 10:55 AM
Re: Zillow's posting property feature:
[Re: DavidG @ Zillow]
|
Major Contributor
Registered: 08/16/04
Posts: 1979
Loc: Cary, NC
|
oh david.... you and the folks at Zillow have alot to learn.
_________________________
the real estate industry is changing...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#135398 - 04/17/07 11:09 AM
Re: Zillow's posting property feature:
[Re: broker]
|
Major Contributor
Registered: 06/23/04
Posts: 3370
Loc: Central Illinois
|
Here is a challenge to all those who feel that what Zillow is doing to be Illegal or Unethical.
Call your state boards legal hotline(it is a free call) and ask? Get their opinion and have them check it out and then we will see how many lawsuits are brought by the state boards. Then we can see what the courts have to say about the issue!
_________________________
Paul Oaks Oaks Real Estate Group
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#135402 - 04/17/07 12:17 PM
Re: Zillow's posting property feature:
[Re: Paul Oaks]
|
Member
Registered: 06/26/06
Posts: 93
|
Actually this may be a great tool for investors. It will make it easy to find those FSBO's that set their price according to the ZEstimate and many times the ZEstimate will be way too low.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#135404 - 04/17/07 12:31 PM
Re: Zillow's posting property feature:
[Re: uniquename]
|
Member
Registered: 01/21/07
Posts: 280
|
Zillow isn't fooling anyone. Every property listed on zillow is either much lower or much higher than the zestimates. This goes to show that the public doesn't have much faith in the Z valuation model.
If I were running Zillow I'd setup a department just to monitor and compare the Zestimates with the actual sale price. If the Zestimate is within 1-5% margin of the sale price, then the industry has some catching up to do.
Otherwise the Z model will be coming to an end soon.
I don't think the majority of people know what Zillow is or care what it is as most people going there are realtors.
_________________________
Why do we assume that those charging less than 6% is a discount company and those charging 6% are giving full service?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
This Google Custom search may do a better job of searching the forums for some keywords than the old forum search does. The results do not include threads from the Asset Managers Forum however. To search that forum you will need to be actually in the Asset Managers Forum and you will need to use the old forum search below.
|
|
Registered: 06/27/10
Posts: 320
|
|
|