|
|
#13052 - 07/28/06 03:27 PM
Re: Prorating Taxes
|
Member
Registered: 04/27/04
Posts: 412
|
The seller isn't liable for the taxes during the time he lived in the home? Wow - I can't see many buyers wanting to pay taxes on the physical months another person lived in the home.
When I was active in Iowa, iowarealtors.org had a page with files, and one was a detailed explanation of the taxes. Don't have access to it now, being in Arkansas, but you might check your state association website.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#13053 - 07/28/06 04:04 PM
Re: Prorating Taxes
|
Member
Registered: 01/14/06
Posts: 724
Loc: Las Vegas
|
That's very different. And customs do change as the market changes. For instance, here we have a local transfer tax on the sale of a property. That's just about always the seller's responsibility. There was a period of time, though, where buyers were willing to pay it and sellers were able to ask it. Also on taxes, basically taxes here are paid ahead, twice a year. So if you buy a home in April, you are responsible for the next two months' taxes and the seller gets that amount back from escrow. We always ask for prorated taxes, but I guess here that means something else than there, since the prorated taxes means money coming back to the seller. --A
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#13054 - 07/28/06 04:43 PM
Re: Prorating Taxes
|
Major Contributor
Registered: 04/21/05
Posts: 1879
Loc: kentucky
|
The best way to explain prorated taxes is that you pay taxes on the number of days that you own the home. Seller pays the amount from January 1 to day of closing, buyer pays the amount from day of closing to Dec. 31. They seem to understand that. If the tax bill is not payable yet, the buyer gets a credit and owes the bill when it comes due.
_________________________
Comments made are my opinion, and not intended to be legal advice of any kind.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#13055 - 07/28/06 05:52 PM
Re: Prorating Taxes
|
Member
Registered: 08/16/05
Posts: 87
Loc: Kokomo, IN
|
Agree with all the above - and I do know how to explain it; I'm just looking for a visual to illustrate it.
We are in a transition mode here - some offers come in asking for proration (the way most of the world does it) but most still come in just asking the seller to pay the next installment.
Perhaps I'm making too much of this, but when doing net sheets for offers, there is usually quite a difference between the two methods. To compound the problem, most agents don't understand proration other than the fact that the sellers lose and the buyers gain!
Added to that, my last closing was on a repo (my listing) that was closing at a bank (not the usual practice). I got the HUD statement and neither the commission nor the taxes were on it! Believe me, I was on the phone immediately! Got the commission taken care of easily; but he had no idea how to prorate taxes. I had to do it for him!
So, as you can tell, it's not only clients who need a visual - most of the real estate community would benefit from one, too.
Any help with a graphic? I know part of this comes from my years as a special ed teacher and consultant - a picture is worth a thousand words!
Thanks,
Betty
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
This Google Custom search may do a better job of searching the forums for some keywords than the old forum search does. The results do not include threads from the Asset Managers Forum however. To search that forum you will need to be actually in the Asset Managers Forum and you will need to use the old forum search below.
|
|
Registered: 02/20/09
Posts: 17
|
|
|