Still depends on the High Vacancy problem. If it is a geographic problem causing the vacancy and there are no economic developement plans in the works for the area then that 40% may dwindle fast and you also need to consider your renovation budget.
Eliminating the Bad management and poor condition will cure the vacancy problem with some advertisement.
I oversee the management of my properties and have a full-time handyman that handles maintainence calls. If is a major problem he has the authority to have the problem fixed. He and his family live rent free plus a small salary in one of my oldest SFR units. If you have say 12 unit building it would be benefical to have an onsite part-time manager.
Originally posted by alvin:
thanks paul,
would you still consider the property if all 3 were problematic in exchange for a 60% FMV? would this be a good manageable risk since you have a 40% equity cushion?
also do you personally manage the properties yourself or do you hire property management?