|
|
#119030 - 01/31/06 10:39 AM
Re: Impounding & compounding property taxes
|
Major Contributor
Registered: 06/23/04
Posts: 3370
Loc: Central Illinois
|
greedyBastard, greedyBastard, greedyBastard..... Most lenders also look at past performance with regards to timely tax payments, Your RISK statement is bull when dealing with A paper clients . If the borrower has a history of always paying the taxes then there should be no .250 or even .125 percentage increase to waive payment of taxes into escrow. RISK is not the reason it is added it is Greed..something you should be familiar with based on your screen name. If the lender requires escrow and another lender cannot be found then the borrower should always go with the Interest Bearing Time Deposit Account. If anyone is going to get the interest it should be the borrower. Your appraisal comment shows your stupidity or lame attempt at humor and regarding the flood certificate that is a worthless expense as this information is also included in the appraisal report except you do not get that pretty form from FEMA. So it is you that needs to get Real!!! Originally posted by GreedyBastard: Paul, paul, paul...
Mortgage pricing is determined by RISK. From a lender perspective, if the property taxes are not paid, the lender faces risk from the government taking claim on the property. Remember, it is the property that is securing the mortgage, so no lender wants to find themselves in a subordinate position to another entity with a claim on the property. As such, a mortgage is less risky when the lender is collecting property tax escrows because they know the property taxes are paid. Most lenders do charge .250% to waive escrows, although there are a few who do not. This .25% is usually built into the yield spread premium when the LO quotes an interest rate. It does not mean your rate is .25% higher. At most the rate would increase by .125%, if there is even an increase.
The lenders are justified in charging for it because they are taking on additional risk. They also charge a tax service fee to monitor that your property taxes are always paid. I guess the flood certification is also a junk fee. Oh yeah, borrowers shouldn't pay for credit reports either. Appraisal? Who needs that? Everyone knows Realtors price properties appropriately. Get real...
_________________________
Paul Oaks Oaks Real Estate Group
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#119031 - 01/31/06 12:04 PM
Re: Impounding & compounding property taxes
|
Member
Registered: 11/01/05
Posts: 32
Loc: Chicago
|
Paul:
I don't know whether to respond or laugh... seriously. It is obvious you have no clue. The sad part is that you will probably be "advising" your client on financing and the buyers won't know any better. I am going to try responding in between laughs...
So I guess Paul, borrowers who use 100% financing shouldn't have to pay extra either? Or the borrower who wants to cash out additional equity? Investment properties aren't any riskier either? These companies have conducted analysis of the performance of millions of mortgages and they have determined what items pose the most risk to a lender... down payments, DTI, property types, occupancy, and yes how property taxes are handled. The technical term is regression analysis. There are literally dozens of "hits" lenders will assess that may result in increased rates or fees if the risk of the loan increases.
Additionally, most mortgages are being sold to Fannie, Freddie, or other investors on Wall Street. These price adjustments reflect what INVESTORS are willng to pay for a loan with certain risk characteristics.
Remember, it is the mortgage company who is putting up the money and taking the risk. They are the ones who take the hit when the borrower defaults. If the borrower doesn't want to pay it, they can buy the home with cash.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#119032 - 01/31/06 12:37 PM
Re: Impounding & compounding property taxes
|
Major Contributor
Registered: 06/23/04
Posts: 3370
Loc: Central Illinois
|
GB, From your posts I can see that you just love to hear yourself talk. Your sad attempts at putting words in other peoples mouths is very amusing. We were speaking of one specific issue and you attempt to deflect the direction of my original post. I said it is Never a good idea to escrow taxes as it makes more sense to pay them from your moneymarket account. If the lender does require escrow it is a better option to choose the Interest Bearing Time Deposit Account. Other lenders and brokers seem to agree with me on this except you the greedybastard. Why is that? I am talking about A paper clients not sub-prime clients. Remember, it is the mortgage company who is putting up the money and taking the risk. They are the ones who take the hit when the borrower defaults. If the borrower doesn't want to pay it, they can buy the home with cash. WOW REALLY!!!  I must have missed class the day they covered that startling fact. Thank You so very much for bringing me up to speed on that!  However did I manage to stay in the real estate business for 17yrs as broker, builder and investor :p I am fully aware of the risk factors associated with residential, new construction and commercial loans. It is you that seems to have lost focus on the fact we were speaking of a single issue. Try to stay on track if you are up to it.
_________________________
Paul Oaks Oaks Real Estate Group
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#119034 - 01/31/06 08:59 PM
Re: Impounding & compounding property taxes
|
Junior Member
Registered: 01/31/06
Posts: 3
Loc: san joaquin CA
|
Any mortgage broker that has accts with a handful of lenders certainly has a lender that won't worsen the rate for A Paper clients for waiving impoundswith an ltv of 80%, including 80-20s. Of course, many of these lenders also are capping and otherwise restricting brokers' total compensation on loans, so plenty of greedy bastards would prefer not to use these lenders. It also varies by program. Libors are pretty flexible.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#119035 - 01/31/06 09:39 PM
Re: Impounding & compounding property taxes
|
Major Contributor
Registered: 06/23/04
Posts: 3370
Loc: Central Illinois
|
mnrebroker, I find it funny that everyone seems to complain how much Realtors make in commission but our fees are upfront and right out there for everyone to see. The mortgage industry as a whole seems to make it there main objective to hide away as many fees into the costs of a loan as they possibly can. If the client fails to ask questions those junk fees stay and it ends up costing them more than it should. Certainly not all mortgage brokers this way but their are far too many that do. I have 3 brokers/loan officers that get all of my business because they have proven time and time again that they can get the job done with minimal hassles and no hidden fees.
[QUOTE]I merely suggested that each real estate agent assist the buyer/borrower by doing the math and making a case by case determination. It doesn't seem to be all tha difficult, and I would think an agent would be happy to make the calculation for the client.[QUOTE]
Try asking your Financial Planner if they would recommend an escrow account. My point was that there are many lenders out there that do not charge an escrow waiver fee. Most(notice I said most and not all) mortgage brokers would not mention the fee.
[QUOTE]I simply disagree with the simple answer. Always and never are words that should be avoided when looking at mortgage products.[QUOTE]
I respect your opinion but we are simply looking at it from a different perspective. Had an investor client call me last week because the company he was financing a property through wanted him to escrow taxes and insurance for the 4-plex he is buying. He owns in the neighborhood of 20 additional properties and writes 2 Large tax checks twice a year. I put him with my commercial lender who got him a better rate no doc loan with no escrow required. My lender could not believe that this broker wanted to force him to escrow. The mortgage broker in question was a relative on the his wife's side of the family.
I only have problems when the fees are hidden. If a broker wants to charge the fee then put it out in the open and drop the smoke and mirrors.
_________________________
Paul Oaks Oaks Real Estate Group
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#119036 - 02/02/06 08:54 AM
Re: Impounding & compounding property taxes
|
Junior Member
Registered: 02/02/06
Posts: 4
Loc: Washington, D.C.
|
You are also forgetting that when investors purchase up to 20 properties, they tax bills may come due at different times of the year. Investment properties in particular are the only time I'd recommend setting up this account because most investors cannot keep up with all the information for the piggeyback mortgages, let alone the different property tax bills and insurance they have to pay throughout the year. The risk of assessing the escrow account up front in a primary purchase is much different than that of setting up on any investor. I too agree that if you aren't being charged for the escrow fee, it's already been built in somewhere.
Most lenders are going to charge that for fee for no other reason than they want the money and they want to ensure their investments.
_________________________
Van Richardson
Senior Loan Consultant First Guaranty Mortgage Corp. 8180 Greensboro Dr., ste. 500 McLean, Virginia 22102 Toll Free: (800) 282-1281 ext. 4921 Direct: (703) 637-4921 eFax: (877) 851-6337 Email: vrichardson@fgmc.com
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#119038 - 02/02/06 03:11 PM
Re: Impounding & compounding property taxes
|
Major Contributor
Registered: 06/23/04
Posts: 3370
Loc: Central Illinois
|
Van, I do not intend to continue this topic debate. My point is if a broker or lender wants to charge the fees they should do so in the open and not hide them.
Since I personally own over the 20+ investment properties I can safely say that I am aware when taxes and insurance are due on a property. My CPA prepares and forwards me the required checks when they need signing and the bills get paid. When you personally own 20+ investment propertiess then perhaps you can tell me what most investors do.
It all boils down to the fees should be out there to see and then let the consumer decide.
_________________________
Paul Oaks Oaks Real Estate Group
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#119039 - 02/02/06 04:12 PM
Re: Impounding & compounding property taxes
|
Mortgage Professional
Veteran Member
Registered: 01/26/05
Posts: 1372
Loc: Lancaster, Ohio
|
It all boils down to the fees should be out there to see and then let the consumer decide. Yes! Paul, perhaps if you did not have any help and did not have credit discipline you would take comfort in just having 1 payment. It is a choice that is given to every customer. I currently am handling 43 transactions and 24 are looking to fund this month. I study very hard an have been found at 6am in my office working my rear off. It is constant and non-stop. Marketing is a huge expense for agents guys. All the 3rd party services add up. MLS, Signs, Gas, Food, Flyers, Mail, and it is a ton of time invested too.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
This Google Custom search may do a better job of searching the forums for some keywords than the old forum search does. The results do not include threads from the Asset Managers Forum however. To search that forum you will need to be actually in the Asset Managers Forum and you will need to use the old forum search below.
|
|
Registered: 01/26/05
Posts: 1968
|
|
|