well, my seller will pay the difference if the investor requests. there might be some room for the seller to pay additional things like CC also. i think that offering to pay the difference in rent is just a bonus, because most investors don't want to be negative for the lease payments. they usually want to be even or making some sort of positive cash flow. nevada is the same way. if the property is sold, the lease must be carried through until the end of the term. this situation would not affect the tenant in any way though.
Originally posted by rrealtor:
For an investor who has to carry the lease over and in most cases the mortgage payment are not going to be the same as the rental it would be more attractive to pay the 2% CC. Maintenance $70 is not too much if you add up any investor who is willing to take over the lease is going to look for good deal and not a $840 saving. In Virgina we have similar law as mentioned above if the property is sold the lease terms and condition does not change and passes to the new owner.
Good Luck